<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 8 Historic Figures That Were Pederasts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ty.rannosaur.us/8-historic-figures-that-were-pederasts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ty.rannosaur.us/8-historic-figures-that-were-pederasts/</link>
	<description>The greatest website a t-rex&#039;s fingers can make.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:41:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gomer</title>
		<link>http://ty.rannosaur.us/8-historic-figures-that-were-pederasts/comment-page-2/#comment-2566</link>
		<dc:creator>Gomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 17:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ty.rannosaur.us/?p=77#comment-2566</guid>
		<description>I was under the impression that Julius II was the patron of Michelangelo, not Julius III.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was under the impression that Julius II was the patron of Michelangelo, not Julius III.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yames</title>
		<link>http://ty.rannosaur.us/8-historic-figures-that-were-pederasts/comment-page-2/#comment-2441</link>
		<dc:creator>Yames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 03:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ty.rannosaur.us/?p=77#comment-2441</guid>
		<description>Um...regarding Bill Burrough&#039;s - you can&#039;t hallucinate on heroin. And that&#039;s a fact. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um&#8230;regarding Bill Burrough&#039;s &#8211; you can&#039;t hallucinate on heroin. And that&#039;s a fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikal</title>
		<link>http://ty.rannosaur.us/8-historic-figures-that-were-pederasts/comment-page-2/#comment-2432</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 19:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ty.rannosaur.us/?p=77#comment-2432</guid>
		<description>There are cases where the boy initiates the relationship</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are cases where the boy initiates the relationship</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lope</title>
		<link>http://ty.rannosaur.us/8-historic-figures-that-were-pederasts/comment-page-1/#comment-2431</link>
		<dc:creator>Lope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2011 00:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ty.rannosaur.us/?p=77#comment-2431</guid>
		<description>Uh, do you what else was acceptable at the time? Burying baby girls. Does it make it right just because people engage in that activity? Of course not. Marrying a girl so young that she was playing with her dolls right before the marriage was consumated is called rape. What does a 9 year old know about sex? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uh, do you what else was acceptable at the time? Burying baby girls. Does it make it right just because people engage in that activity? Of course not. Marrying a girl so young that she was playing with her dolls right before the marriage was consumated is called rape. What does a 9 year old know about sex?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: historynerd</title>
		<link>http://ty.rannosaur.us/8-historic-figures-that-were-pederasts/comment-page-1/#comment-1696</link>
		<dc:creator>historynerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ty.rannosaur.us/?p=77#comment-1696</guid>
		<description>I appreciate you making a distinction between &#039;gay&#039;, &#039;pederast&#039; and &#039;pedophile&#039;.  The terms, as you clearly understand, thankfully, are not synonymous.  Gay = sexual attraction to one&#039;s own gender; pederast = sexual attraction to youths/young men (also known as hebephile); pedophile = sexual attraction to children. 
 
Many of the men cited lived in eras where a romantic/sexual relationship between and older man and a younger man, or even boy, were not uncommon.  Plus, quite often, the younger was of a &quot;lower&quot; economic and social status.  Clearly, being involved in a pederastic relationship was of some benefit to the younger male.  It was not about abuse (such as pedophilia is) although quite often there were power dynamics involved, with the older, higher status man holding the power, although -- arguably -- the younger &#039;beloved&#039; held power too by virtue of his being the object of desire. Such dynamics are never black and white....  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate you making a distinction between &#039;gay&#039;, &#039;pederast&#039; and &#039;pedophile&#039;.  The terms, as you clearly understand, thankfully, are not synonymous.  Gay = sexual attraction to one&#039;s own gender; pederast = sexual attraction to youths/young men (also known as hebephile); pedophile = sexual attraction to children. </p>
<p>Many of the men cited lived in eras where a romantic/sexual relationship between and older man and a younger man, or even boy, were not uncommon.  Plus, quite often, the younger was of a &quot;lower&quot; economic and social status.  Clearly, being involved in a pederastic relationship was of some benefit to the younger male.  It was not about abuse (such as pedophilia is) although quite often there were power dynamics involved, with the older, higher status man holding the power, although &#8212; arguably &#8212; the younger &#039;beloved&#039; held power too by virtue of his being the object of desire. Such dynamics are never black and white&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

