<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 8 Historic Figures That Were Pederasts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ty.rannosaur.us/8-historic-figures-that-were-pederasts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ty.rannosaur.us/8-historic-figures-that-were-pederasts/</link>
	<description>The greatest website a t-rex&#039;s fingers can make.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:31:57 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: historynerd</title>
		<link>http://ty.rannosaur.us/8-historic-figures-that-were-pederasts/comment-page-1/#comment-1696</link>
		<dc:creator>historynerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 07:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ty.rannosaur.us/?p=77#comment-1696</guid>
		<description>I appreciate you making a distinction between &#039;gay&#039;, &#039;pederast&#039; and &#039;pedophile&#039;.  The terms, as you clearly understand, thankfully, are not synonymous.  Gay = sexual attraction to one&#039;s own gender; pederast = sexual attraction to youths/young men (also known as hebephile); pedophile = sexual attraction to children. 
 
Many of the men cited lived in eras where a romantic/sexual relationship between and older man and a younger man, or even boy, were not uncommon.  Plus, quite often, the younger was of a &quot;lower&quot; economic and social status.  Clearly, being involved in a pederastic relationship was of some benefit to the younger male.  It was not about abuse (such as pedophilia is) although quite often there were power dynamics involved, with the older, higher status man holding the power, although -- arguably -- the younger &#039;beloved&#039; held power too by virtue of his being the object of desire. Such dynamics are never black and white....  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate you making a distinction between &#039;gay&#039;, &#039;pederast&#039; and &#039;pedophile&#039;.  The terms, as you clearly understand, thankfully, are not synonymous.  Gay = sexual attraction to one&#039;s own gender; pederast = sexual attraction to youths/young men (also known as hebephile); pedophile = sexual attraction to children. </p>
<p>Many of the men cited lived in eras where a romantic/sexual relationship between and older man and a younger man, or even boy, were not uncommon.  Plus, quite often, the younger was of a &quot;lower&quot; economic and social status.  Clearly, being involved in a pederastic relationship was of some benefit to the younger male.  It was not about abuse (such as pedophilia is) although quite often there were power dynamics involved, with the older, higher status man holding the power, although &#8212; arguably &#8212; the younger &#039;beloved&#039; held power too by virtue of his being the object of desire. Such dynamics are never black and white&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vzk</title>
		<link>http://ty.rannosaur.us/8-historic-figures-that-were-pederasts/comment-page-1/#comment-988</link>
		<dc:creator>vzk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 23:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ty.rannosaur.us/?p=77#comment-988</guid>
		<description>No, pederasts are gay pedophiles. He married a girl. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, pederasts are gay pedophiles. He married a girl.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skrizach</title>
		<link>http://ty.rannosaur.us/8-historic-figures-that-were-pederasts/comment-page-1/#comment-980</link>
		<dc:creator>skrizach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 18:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ty.rannosaur.us/?p=77#comment-980</guid>
		<description>Very interesting. 
As for your writing style, you use the word &quot;him&quot; way too ambiguously after bringing up multiple people in one paragraph.  You meaning gets twisted as to which him&quot; you are referring to.  Most notably seen in #3 Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting.<br />
As for your writing style, you use the word &quot;him&quot; way too ambiguously after bringing up multiple people in one paragraph.  You meaning gets twisted as to which him&quot; you are referring to.  Most notably seen in #3 Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sami</title>
		<link>http://ty.rannosaur.us/8-historic-figures-that-were-pederasts/comment-page-1/#comment-430</link>
		<dc:creator>Sami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ty.rannosaur.us/?p=77#comment-430</guid>
		<description>No, he would inspire this: &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romeo_and_Juliet_(Tchaikovsky)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romeo_and_Juliet_(Tc...&lt;/a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romeo_and_Juliet_(Tc...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, he would inspire this: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romeo_and_Juliet_(Tchaikovsky)" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romeo_and_Juliet_(Tc...</a rel="nofollow">&#8221; target=&#8221;_blank&#8221;></a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romeo_and_Juliet_(Tc.." rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romeo_and_Juliet_(Tc..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sami</title>
		<link>http://ty.rannosaur.us/8-historic-figures-that-were-pederasts/comment-page-1/#comment-703</link>
		<dc:creator>Sami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ty.rannosaur.us/?p=77#comment-703</guid>
		<description>No, he would inspire this: &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romeo_and_Juliet_(Tchaikovsky)&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romeo_and_Juliet_(Tc...&lt;/a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romeo_and_Juliet_(Tc...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, he would inspire this: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romeo_and_Juliet_(Tchaikovsky)" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romeo_and_Juliet_(Tc...</a rel="nofollow">&#8221; target=&#8221;_blank&#8221;></a><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romeo_and_Juliet_(Tc.." rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romeo_and_Juliet_(Tc..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
